What the Jeffrey Epstein Case Can Teach Us about Drug Law Policy Reform

Some individuals could possibly wonder what a pedophile and a sex trafficker has to do with drug reform. Certainly there can be no connection amongst the two?


Effectively, you’d be incorrect there. The most recent developments in “high-profile” individuals and their connection to human trafficking sheds a light on law enforcement resource allocation, as properly as what we deem “important” inside society.


You see, at present the biggest illicit market place on the planet is “Drugs”. The yearly estimate of drugs, in terms of income comes out to roughly a half a trillion dollars. That is a lot of cheese. In reality, it is estimated that the illegal drug trade tends to make up 1% of international trade.


Primarily based on these figures, a lot of argue that it is crucial that we “do anything about it” and that the “drug war” could possibly be a right response. Just after all, these illegal markets also fund other illegal activities inside the criminal element.


Even so, drug consumption is a individual point. Customers, for the most aspect, “choose” to consume drugs. They go out and break the law for the reason that they want to get higher. They could possibly be attempting to escape particular realities, or cope with the misery they get in touch with life. Even so, no one particular is holding a gun to their heads when shopping for the drugs.


What Epstein and his Ilk do


If “Drugs” is the biggest illicit marketplace in the planet, what is the second? Some individuals would assume “Arms”, which is fairly significant, but they would be incorrect. The second biggest illicit market place in the planet is “human trafficking”.


Human trafficking comes in a lot of types from organ harvesting, sex trade and slave labor to name a handful of. According to some estimates, far more than 40 million individuals are getting trafficked every single year with 75% of them getting females and young children.


81% of human trafficked victims finish up in a forced labor scenarios with 25% of them getting young children. On typical it charges amongst $four,000 USD – $50,000 USD per trafficked individual. This variable depends a lot on the point of origin of the trafficked individual.


Which brings us to the point. Who can definitely afford human trafficking? Who can dish out $four,000 – $50,000 USD per individual? This is not like shopping for an ounce of weed off the street. The value entry point tends to make the illegal trafficking of individuals a “rich individual game”.


Epstein, what ever you’d like to get in touch with him, was mostly a human trafficker who catered to the ultra-wealthy. Men and women like Bill Clinton has flown on the “Lolita Express” on far more than 27 occasions. Just take a appear at all the distinct individuals who engaged with him. Some of them are royalty.


The point right here is that each individual connected to Epstein had been “high profile” individuals who have the implies to get individuals.


It then begins producing sense why “Drug Laws” are our quantity one particular concern in society, for the reason that as lengthy as we’re arresting individuals finding higher, the ultra-wealthy elitists can maintain on raping young children. For the previous 45+ years, we have brought down the complete force of the law on attempting to cease individuals from smoking weed, however our efforts in the human trafficking side of points had been far far more docile.


What is our social priority?


If our motivation for the drug war is to maintain “society safe”, we ought to query our priorities when we appear at statistics. How can we justify arresting individuals and stopping the flow of drugs, even though 40+ million individuals are getting trafficked every single day?


As pointed out, drug consumption is mostly a individual selection. Men and women get drugs so they can consume it, they do not get it to drug other individuals (for the most aspect).


Even so, there is practically nothing individual about human trafficking. Is not it a far higher priority to cease poor actors from actually stealing other humans, promoting them to forced labor or the sex trade? Wouldn’t that make society “safer”?


Why it is so difficult to catch human traffickers


My theory on this is that most “buyers” are higher-profiled individuals. The typical Joe and Jane merely cannot afford to get yet another human. They do not have the implies or the wish to “own a human”.


Even so, the wealthy-elite has income to spare and ordinarily sit in positions of energy. As pointed out, Bill Clinton is potentially (by mere association) a youngster-fucking-human-trafficking piece of shit. Of course, he could possibly not be…but to fly with a now-identified human trafficker on an airplane that was dubbed “Lolita express” far more than 20 instances, tends to make us wonder.


But can you visualize the political scandal that would take place if the police went just after Clinton in his heyday? What about the huge time judges and CEOs of significant corporations? These are ordinarily the “type of person” who would engage with these illicit activities.


As you can see, their positions give them some “protection” from the law, on the other hand they know it is not sufficient. They have to have the Law to be focused on the non-violent, drug customer, for the reason that if the police are not diverting their sources, they’ll have far more to go just after these sex-demons.


Epstein’s case only shows us the significance of dialing down the drug war considerably, and to concentrate our sources on the actual injustices…there are 40million+ individuals every single year that would agree wholeheartedly.