Alaska Could Disband Its Cannabis Board. Is That… Excellent or Negative?


JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — Gov. Mike Dunleavy desires to repeal the boards tasked with regulating alcohol and marijuana in Alaska, according to documents from state officials.

The program was outlined in a letter to commerce division staff by commissioner Julie Anderson and in a memo from Alcohol and Marijuana Handle Workplace director Erika McConnell.

The documents say Dunleavy desires to repeal the Marijuana Handle Board and the Alcoholic Beverage Handle Board and transfer authority and responsibilities of the boards to the commissioner. This is billed as a way to lower the “regulatory burden in efforts to expand entrepreneurialism.”

Dunleavy spokesman Matt Shuckerow mentioned additional particulars will be released when legislation addressing the boards is introduced. But he mentioned Dunleavy is seeking at strategies to come across efficiencies in government. Shuckerow mentioned other states regulate these industries at the agency level and permit for public engagement.

Mark Springer, chairman of the Marijuana Handle Board, mentioned he is concerned about the openness and level of public involvement in the regulatory course of action if guidelines governing the sector are drafted administratively alternatively of by a board. He mentioned the board requires pride in the record it has established on choices it has produced.

Springer also noted that the 2014 voter-authorized initiative legalizing adult-use cannabis referenced establishment of a Marijuana Handle Board.

Each the alcohol and marijuana handle boards serve significant purposes in defending the wellness and security of Alaska residents, Springer mentioned.

Meanwhile, McConnell mentioned in her memo that the state Division of Public Security had terminated her office’s access to databases for crime reporting and data necessary for enforcement officers to conduct thorough investigations. She writes that this has hampered investigators in their enforcement duties and compromised security since investigators are unable to recognize people flagged as a danger to officer security.

Investigators generally make unscheduled visits to web-sites in response to complaints or suggestions, McConnell wrote.

“With no access to these databases, the investigators could go to interview a person who is topic to a warrant or possibly armed and harmful, with no obtaining any warning or data,” McConnell wrote.

The Division of Public Security has indicated it is concerned the FBI will strip the state’s access to the databases if marijuana regulators use them considering the fact that marijuana is illegal on the federal level, she mentioned. But she mentioned the division has not asked the FBI if there is a issue and the FBI did not in a 2017 audit flag any difficulties with marijuana regulators accessing criminal justice data.

The division has agreed to offer requested data for precise investigations but that arrangement is unworkable, McConnell wrote.


Latest posts